Analysis of Marxist Theories of Crime

Analysis of Marxist Theories of Crime gibe to Karl Marx, execration is as a answer of the social buildings and the economic system that is applyKarl Marx is a renowned scholar who came up with different kinds of theories to explain the various(a) situations in the gentlemans gentleman of sociology and economics. In his school of criminology, he largely focuses on betrothal criminology and why things change and the role of society in these changes. He acknowledges that the shift from mavin society to an different is non at either smooth as in that respect atomic number 18 obstacles for example, offence.According to Marxism, for the different societies in the world, in that respect exist different social figurees. These ar based on what each group owns and what it is therefore in control of. The conflict was headstrong due to the ownership of the center of product which included land, labor and as well asls. Hence, the conflict was between the owners and the non-own ers of the various means of take. As a resultant, there was a rise of the two social septes the working word form ( little billetful) and the command sept (more powerful).In a capitalist economic system, the main means of production include factories and machineries. As a result, the owners of these means of production argon unwrap to gain only that they can from the implementation of these means of production. However, they still lack labor in order to bump off the production process. Their main butt is to maximize profits and as such(prenominal), they result to minimization of the labor cost as much as possible. As a result, the working household is angered by the low wages and is ultimately tired of the developing by the persistent means of production owners. Eventually, the working path t ends to modify itself from the overbearing production process. The working program pull up stakes therefore tense up anything in its power so as to overthrow the owners who call for interminably been exploiting their labor. (Crutchfield, 2000)In their continuous endeavor to overthrow the dominating feeling class, there is competition among them and things wrench harder. Karl Marx notes that in due course, the working class realizes that the means of production owners also dominate the political divide. As such, their inescapably ar well catered for in the formation of the laws that reign over them. They not only suck up economic control, but also political control. It is then that the working class realizes that they are trapped in their course for freedom and equality.The working class therefore becomes vulnerable and results to curse. After all, there is hardly any path by as the owners of means of production have completely dominate the economy. The poor continue to be poor while the rich become richer. Marxist representd that it was only through theorists like them coming out to clearly inform the working class of who their enemies rea lly are that the conflict resolving power would advance and at last the working class would achieve their sole butt of having both(prenominal) form of control. He argued that with the underpinnings of the capitalist system cosmos brought to light, the communicate of this system would be hastened and a communist system would be eventually reached. A system where there were no rights to private property and hence, a society free of classes and oppression. (Tibbetts Hemmens, 2009)Though he did not largely know on deviance, Karl largely mentioned about criminal tendencies. He even ironically mentions that had there been no criminals, then personnel such as resolve and the police would have no jobs. Marx largely dwells on the societal pressures in doing wrongs another(prenominal) than the individual motives of being immoral. This is largely supported by some scholars for example, Merton who argues that the problem of alienation is mainly due to the social structure other than social change since the society presents equal goal to be achieved except there are no equal means of achieving the set out goals and objectives. It therefore becomes a form of survival for the fittest. Deviance therefore, is as a result of incompatibility of what the society expects of the working class and the social structure that is in existence.It is accepted by all sociologists that for a society to race effectively, there needs to exist some sort of social order. Laws that govern a state should be for the sole interest of the state. However, there seems to stupefy out a group that is always leading. This could be as a result of the power that they solely possess. The emergence of such a group could be as a result of efficiently and effectively using power. According to Marx, it is also a huge possibility that the group owns the means of production and is hence in control. A impregnable example is the caseful of British Colonialism Law in East Africa that resulted in the ruling class having complete control over the coffee plantations. As a result execration becomes on the rise as the working class, though wrongfully, fights for its right.According to the sociologist researchers, it is clear once a group of people have political power, they end embedding all ownership rights of property to themselves and the working class is remaining at their mercy. As a result, offensive rises. Marx was for the idea that means of production should be communally owned in a communist system. As a result, there would be less crime being committed. The only settlement to the crime issue is to have a socialist revolution. For example, in western Europe there is very minimal crime since that art object of the world is more socialist as compared to the United States of America. (Marsh Melville, 2006)On the issue of crime, Karl Marxs system of alienation is also applicable. Over the years, some types of crime have ceaselessly been labeled working class crime. T he only question that is commonly left out is whether or not there are certain reasons that advert these crimes to only be mostly committed by the working class group. Critically looking at it, it becomes clearer that there are certain factors that set out the working class as the sole victims of these crimes. We also note that crimes in the society do vary depending on different elements for example, age.In case a crime has been committed, it is pellucid that the judgment passed is highly interdependent on the social class that one belongs to. Marxism argued that the final judgment is highly dependent on ones ability to be represented by a good lawyer. However, it is notably difficult for an individual from the working class group to be able to hire a good lawyer due to the moderate factors such as financial limitations. The same analysis is persistent in hurt of the punishment that the offender receives. This leads to bias and inequality.thitherfore, the main causes of crimi nality are hugely as a result of capitalism. For instance, the huge economic inequalities whereby the helpless (working class) are exploited by the powerful (ruling class). It is also vividly evident that the values imposed by capitalism push the working class to committing crimes. There is also the tendency of laws to imply that working class groups are the more likely wrong doers than the ruling class. As a result, there exists conflict between the working class individuals who also believe that they are enemies yet it is the ruling class who continuously exploit them every other day. (Greenberg, 1993)The Marxist theories do not at all rely on the available statistics on crime. They insist on the fact they are genuinely biased and do not at all in a clear way represent the actual distribution of criminality. They also argue that the statistics do not include the crimes of the ruling class because the laws governing such information are hugely biased. They do not allow entrance fee to some crimes those committed by the ruling class are protected.As a result the Realists have criticized these views by the Marxists. They agree that the official statistics whitethorn be inaccurate but they still argue that the dismissal is too readily done. They argue that the statistics would be a huge basis for the explanations of crime and deviance. This therefore is a major weakness of the Marxist theories.Another major criticism is based on the fact that the Marxist theories do not deal with matters of gender and crime. As such, the theories are viewed to be inconclusive. For instance, in terms of gender, the theories would have dealt with issues on domestic violence. It is more likely that the working class women would be more prone to domestic violence as compared to women of the ruling class. This could be partly because the available incomes do not meet the needs that present themselves and arguments therefore ensue resulting in domestic violence.Generally, the leve l of crime is highly propagated by the fact that in our societies there exist classes and as a result there result conflicts between the different classes. The ruling class, which is more powerful, uses law to cover for their evil deeds that go unpunished. On the other hand, the working class is always punished for any crime because they are just mere subjects.These crimes are majorly as a result of the capitalism system which only dehumanizes the individuals who have hardly any power and are therefore helpless. The only solution to all the suffering so that everyone will feel that they are receiving equal treatments is the capitalism system being scrapped off. This way, crime will be largely decreasing. For as long as people are not treated equally, criminal behavior will never cease since there will always be one group of people that will be being exploited. (Akers, 1999)There have been suggestions by several scholars on peaceful solutions to criminology. This is such that in bus iness office of imprisonment, offenders should be practice of mediation so as to solve the arising problem. There should also be a theory why women commit less crime as compared to men, even in situations where the women are also part of the ruling class.From the above evaluation, we all anticipate that the findings of the Marxist would be put into practice so as to go over that there is equality all over the world. This is a free world and no one should be discriminated against just because they are not of a particular social divide. insurance policy makers in states should carefully choose the best economic system to ensure equality of its people. The interest of the people should always be prioritized. The Marxists findings are a basis for a better tomorrow.